Tory MP tells asylum seekers to “f*** off back to France” if they don’t like barges
Amidst the ongoing debate about asylum seekers being housed on barges, Tory MP Lee Anderson’s populist views have stirred controversy.
Amidst the ongoing debate about asylum seekers being housed on barges, Tory MP Lee Anderson’s populist views have stirred controversy.
I n an interview for the Daily Express, the Tory MP and Conservative Party Deputy Chair, Lee Anderson, expressed his opinion on asylum seekers being housed in barges. In what can be described as despicable language, he said that if migrants are not satisfied with the conditions on board the barges, they should return to France or not come at all.
“If they don’t like barges, then they should fuck off back to France... I think people have just had enough. These people come across the Channel in small boats. If they don’t like the conditions they are housed in here then they should go back to France or better not come at all in the first place.”
— Lee Anderson, MP & Conservatives Deputy Chair
Lee Anderson has a history of making contentious statements, including remarks about food bank usage. These past comments have contributed to his reputation for outspokenness. While his expression may be unorthodox, Anderson’s latest statements reflect a broader debate on immigration and asylum policy.
Subjective feelings rather than objective facts?
The issue at hand revolves around the housing of asylum seekers who arrive via small boats across the Channel. Anderson’s statement underscores the growing frustration felt by some regarding the situation.
Even though, in fact, data from Migration Watch UK, a think tank advocating for stricter migration controls, reveals that small boat crossings are currently 17% lower than the corresponding period in 2022.
Small boats
According to recent polling by YouGov, a staggering 80% of Britons express little to no confidence in Rishi Sunak’s ability to reduce the number of asylum seekers crossing the Channel in small boats. This lack of confidence is consistent among both Conservative and Labour voters, although Tories tend to be “not very” confident while Labour supporters are more inclined to be “not at all” confident.
While these figures may appear disheartening for the government, it is worth noting that if 80% of the population anticipates no reduction in small boat crossings, even a modest decrease would surpass expectations.
Considering these statistics, it is clear that Sunak’s potential achievement of any reduction in small boat crossings should be viewed as a noteworthy accomplishment.
More than eight in ten believe the government is handling immigration badly. | CREDIT: YOUGOV
CONTINUE READING...
Enjoy unlimited access now.
To get full access to this article,
simply become a member of PUBLIC SQUARE now.
By doing so, you will be supporting
our independent journalism.
MEMBERSHIP OPTIONS:
£3/month ∙ £5/month ∙ £7/month
You can cancel anytime.
BECOME A MEMBER
Already a member? Sign in here!
BENEFITS OF MEMBERSHIP:
✅ Read exclusive member-only articles
✅ Read our daily review of the UK front pages
✅ Receive every new article by email
✅ Access all our articles
✅ Get Special Discounts with our partners
✅ Join the conversation: Comment our articles
✅ Access our archives
✅ More importantly: Support independent journalism and keep the magazine going
Read more
— Donald Trump’s second inaugural speech showcased an authoritarian manifesto, blending messianic self-aggrandisement, disdain for democratic norms, and admiration for dictators, marking a profound shift toward personality-driven, divisive governance.
— In his fiery address, Donald Trump pledged bold, contentious reforms prioritising immigration, energy, and national sovereignty, reigniting “America First” rhetoric.
— Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces calls to resign amid economic woes, media scrutiny, and opposition claims. However, her credentials match past chancellors, and Britain’s longstanding structural issues, not her policies, fuel criticism.
— After two years investigating Donald Trump, special counsel Jack Smith’s work ended with a scathing but legally impotent report, highlighting alleged election lies, pressures, and violence-linked rhetoric.
|